“Absolutely”

•July 20, 2009 • Leave a Comment

absolutely_fabulous

John Blake cnn.com

It’s a verbal virus that’s spreading unchecked on TV, radio and in print.

Want to sound certain? Want to remove all doubt? Want to be a commentator on TV?

Absolutely.

It has become the standard reply to every question or comment. It clings like lint to our conversations.

Are we in a recession senator? “Absolutely not.” Was Michael Jackson a musical genius? “Absolutely.” Want syrup on those pancakes? Absolutely.

It’s even reached the highest office in the land. When President Obama was recently asked by a Pakistani journalist if he read Urdu poetry, he said: “Absolutely.”

We hear of videos that go viral. But why has this word, absolutely, taken off? Tell us what overused words drive you crazy!

And why, at a time of so much uncertainty, are so many people so absolutely sure of so much?

The question caught some habitual users of absolutely by surprise. But they had their theories.

‘Semantic surety’ for uncertain times

Jeff Benanto, a manager at a marketing company in Boston, Massachusetts, says he didn’t even know he was overusing the word until he was teased by his sister and brother-in-law.

He says it finally hit him when he was recently having dinner with his family. Someone asked him if he wanted stuffing with his turkey.

“Absolutely.”

Benanto says he and others are using the word so much because it’s reassuring. He says people don’t know if their 401(k) will be secure; their children’s toys free of lead or if their favorite public figure is going to be exposed as a hypocrite.

But using absolutely makes one feel as if there is something someone can count on, even if one has doubts, he says.

“There’s a certainty in absolutely,” Benanto says. “Even if you don’t absolutely mean it, you need to express it and feel it like you mean it.”

Another absolutist also says that the constant use of the word is a sign of the times.

Liz Nicklos, an account executive in Minneapolis, Minnesota, says she used to respond to e-mail requests with “will do,” or “great,” or “sounds good.”

Now she uses, absolutely, for virtually all e-mail requests.

“Absolutely sounds confident and sure,” Nicklos says. “In times of ambivalence, people could use a bit of semantic surety. When you use it, you just feel more confident.”

When absolutely took off

An etymologist can trace the origin and development of a word, but who can identify the moment when absolutely took off?

Rex Bossert, an assistant dean at the University of California, Irvine’s School of Law, thinks he can. He blames O.J..

He says he noticed people starting favoring the word during the O.J. Simpson murder trial. He points to Simpson’s plea. When Simpson was asked at his 1994 arraignment on twin murder charges if he was guilty, he didn’t just say, not guilty.

Simpson said: “Absolutely, 100 percent not guilty.”

In the court of public opinion, celebrities now know that people are cynical, Bossert says. They expect spin and deception. Invoking absolutely is someone’s attempt to say, I’m not like the other guys, he says.

“In a time where there is so much mendacity and prevarication, a simple affirmation such as ‘yes’ doesn’t quite cut it anymore,” he says.

It’s also a way for pundits, bloggers and talk-show hosts to elevate themselves during the 24-hours news cycle, says Robert Thompson, a professor of pop culture history at Syracuse University in New York City.

In the rapid-fire exchanges between debaters on news shows, “absolutely” is the linguistic version of an exclamation point, Thompson says.

“The word, absolutely, is like saying that this is positively true — this is inarguable,” Thompson says.

Will constant use of the word, though, drain it of all of its meaning? Maybe.

A wise man once said, “Let your yes be yes and your no be no; anything beyond this is evil.”

Was he right?

Absolutely.

Swearing increases tolerance for pain

•July 13, 2009 • Leave a Comment

hijo de p

by Caitlin Hagan cnn.com

Dr. Richard Stephens and his team at Keele University in the United Kingdom just published a study that says swearing actually has a pain-lessening effect. (See Mom? It’s healthy!) When we swear, we increase our threshold for pain, meaning we can bear it longer and don’t feel it as much. Stephens is not sure why this happens, only that for some reason, “swearing appears to increase our pain tolerance.”

Like those moments when I stub my toe, Stephens came up with the idea to study this after he accidentally whacked his finger with a hammer. “I swore a bit and then around the same time, our daughter was born. My wife swore throughout her labor…and the midwife said don’t worry about it, we hear that language all the time.” Not surprising, says clinical psychologist Paula Bloom. “From my own experience of giving birth without drugs to a 9 pound, 11 ounce child, I can imagine I had quite the little truck driver vocabulary going on.”

For the study, Stephens asked the participants to submerge one hand in nearly freezing water for as long as they could while repeating a curse word. Later the participants submerged the same hand again, this time repeating a word they would use to describe a table. When people were cursing, they kept their hand in the water for 40 more seconds than they could otherwise. So what were the words that made that possible? Turns out they were different for everyone. “We decided at the outset that people would give us their own swear words,” Stephens said. “Swearing is quite personal and what one person finds extremely offensive, someone else may not find offensive at all.” That being said, the usual suspects topped the list: s**t, the F word and British slang – bollocks!

Legend of the Petosky Stone

•June 28, 2009 • Leave a Comment

LegendOfPetoskeyStone

Lois Beardslee reviews Legend of the Petosky Stone at Oyate.

“My elders have told me that the very title, the very notion of this book so offends them that they will not open the book or even look at it. The Petoskey stone is so sacred to us that we have no origin story for it, they say. I understand. We are inseparable from our stories and our traditions, and to us, the fabrication of “Native American myths and legends” by white people is a threat to our very survival. When one disregards our culture, one disregards us as human beings.

I sometimes feel the urge to wash my hands after touching this type of book, but the concept of this one was so egregiously offensive to me that the book lay unopened on my office floor for over a year. I simply couldn’t find civilized words to describe such an uncivilized act against our local Indian people.

The Legend of the Petosky Stone purports to be a legend about a Native American chief from a community on the eastern shore of Lake Michigan. It also purports to tell the origin of the name of the northwest Michigan town of Petoskey, as well as the transfer of that name to a fossilized coral that was made the official state stone. There is absolutely nothing factual or traditional in this book. The language pronunciation guides, the explanations, the translations, are all false.”

I before E except after C

•June 21, 2009 • Leave a Comment

AP, June 20, 2009

LONDON — It’s a spelling mantra that generations of schoolchildren have learned — “i before e, except after c.” But new British government guidance tells teachers not to pass on the rule to students, because there are too many exceptions. The “Support For Spelling” document, which is being sent to thousands of primary schools, says the rule “is not worth teaching” because it doesn’t account for words like ’sufficient,’ ‘veil’ and ‘their.’ Jack Bovill of the Spelling Society, which advocates simplified spelling, said Saturday he agreed with the decision. But supporters say the ditty has value because it is one of the few language rules that most people remember.

iws

Obama’s obeisance/slight tilt/stoop/bow/bending-over

•April 11, 2009 • Leave a Comment

President Obama greeted King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia last week. Conservative critics called it a bow but the White House denies that the president “bowed”.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs addressed the issue on Thursday saying, “I think he bent over with both hands to shake his hand.”

bowing3

Other presidents have experienced controversy after greeting foreign leaders. President Clinton’s greeting of Japan’s Emperor Akihito was allegedly a “bow” but the White House said it was a “slight tilt”.

By the way, conservative critics, I found this picture of George Bush bowing to Joseph Ratzinger, the Pope.

pope-bush

“Ghetto” Court

•January 31, 2009 • Leave a Comment

leavey

The City of Detroit’s top lawyer resigned Thursday, January 15, a day after she allegedly said the city’s predominantly black 36th District Court was “acting like a ghetto court.”

Deputy Mayor Saul Green accepted her resignation Thursday, the same day that 36th District Court Chief Judge Marylin Atkins sent a letter to Kathleen Leavey and other city officials protesting her alleged remarks.

Leavey said in an interview this morning that her remarks were taken out of context.

Leavey, who is white, said she got into a heated discussion Wednesday with a court administrator about the court’s handling of a lawsuit against the court in which it asked the city to pay the judgment of $400,000 against it without warning.

“I told her people regard this as a ghetto court because of the way they treat people,” Leavey said.

Leavey said she was referring to long lines and slow service at the court – not it’s predominately African-American group of judges and rejected Atkins’ labeling of her as a racist. The administrator contacted Atkins, who contacted Deputy Mayor Saul Green, Leavey said.

“In her mind it was racist, and the mayor and deputy mayor also felt it was racist and felt I had to resign,” she said.

Atkins said today her letter speaks for itself.

A letter she wrote to Leavey said the remarks came during a Jan. 14 meeting between Leavey, Chief Assistant Corporation Counsel Dennis Mazurek and members of the court staff. They met to discuss funding for the court.

Atkins said in the letter that Leavey told court staffers that “when the court stopped ‘acting like a ghetto court,’ the city would be more inclined to pay for our operations” – a claim Leavey denied.

The letter said Mazurek called the court a “part-time” operation because judges are unavailable in the afternoons and that the court is uncooperative with the city.

Atkins said in the letter that she was “absolutely offended by your characterization of this court as ‘ghetto.’ How dare you! Not only are your words insulting and racist to this court and the entire city, but they are highly unprofessional coming from the highest ranking attorney for the City of Detroit.

The Detroit Free Press

This was a comment posted by MBaby5187 about the above video: 

If she thought the court was ‘ghetto’, who cares: they’re her thoughts.
It’s ironic that she’s a defender of the law, but it punished for exercising her freedom of speech rights. Ppl are way too uptight now-a-days, one can’t even state his/her opinion?!”

duanantwonatony also commented:

“Yeah, it is ghetto, very unprofessional. Everything here in Detroit is GHETTO–The Secreatry of State, waiting in line for hours, staying there all day–GHETTO, the Detroit City Council–GHETTO; and the Detroit Public School board–GHETTO.”

arrogance of black city officials in Detroit is unreal. I saw the article in the paper(I’m in Detroit visiting family right now) and the garbage about the court having a “positive reputation” is just that…garbage.
Because Leavy is white and used the word…about a Detroit court, it could be perceived as a racist comment.
Ask the average Black person in Detoit…they will tell you the 36th district court is ghetto.
Blacks can say “ghetto”…whites cannot.
Was her comment accurate…yes

Swedish names

•January 31, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Employees with foreign backgrounds working for a telemarketing company in Jönköping in central Sweden claim management encouraged them to change their names in order to increase sales.

“The first thing I heard was that I should change my name because otherwise I wouldn’t sell anything,” said one Business by Phone employee to TV4 news.Ombudsman (DO), it is unacceptable to justify the practice by arguing that customers don’t want to buy things from salespeople with foreign backgrounds.

He added that he felt “peer pressure” to comply with the practice.

Out of the company’s roughly 20 employees, 14 claim they were forced to use made-up, “Swedish” sounding names in order to hide their ethnic background from customers.

According to Sweden’s Equality

“If it’s the case that this is something being directed toward people with a certain ethnic background, it could certainly be a case of ethnic discrimination,” Torbjörn Andersson, a lawyer with the Equality Ombudsman (DO), told TV4

In an email to the television station, Business by Phone’s management denied that it had ever ordered employees to change their name.

The Local

Boys vs Girls

•December 2, 2008 • 1 Comment

I was listening to this NPR podcast yesterday and Amy Dickinson brought up single sex classrooms in her discussion with Deborah Tannen about language and gender (actually sex). The two mentioned studies that show female students in single sex classes generally do better academically than girls in co-ed environments, at least in middle school and high school. Dickinson told a story about a teacher who tried to call on boys and girls equally in her classroom and was surprised when the boys “revolted” and complained that the teacher wasn’t being fair. Allegedly, the boys’ perception was that girls who speak as much as boys talk too much. The teacher was calling on the boys more frequently in order to manage behavioral problems, according to Dickinson. This was particularly eye-opening because I realized I tend to engage certain students more than others in order to deter behavioral distractions in my classroom — and those students tend to be boys, at least at the elementary and middle school level. However, I have been reminded at least four times in the past three months by both girls and boys that they were making sure I called their respective sex equally. These students, all in the early elementary level, were paying close attention to who was doing the talking, literally keeping a tally.

I was surprised to find that while in 2002 only 11 public schools offered single sex education, now, in fall 2008, over 500 will, according to the National Association for Single Sex Public Education (NASSPE)

Amanda Datnow of the University of Toronto and Elisabeth Woody of UC Berkeley, in a study of 12 California single sex schools conducted from 1998 until 2000, found that:

  • Traditional gender stereotypes were often reinforced in single-sex academies. Boys tended to be taught in more regimented, traditional and individualistic fashion and girls in more nurturing, cooperative and open environments.
  • Students received mixed messages about gender. While both were told women could be anything they want, girls were made aware of restrictions on their behavior reinforced through expectations about clothing and appearance. Boys were led to assume that men are primary wage earners, that they should be strong and take care of their wives who were emotionally weaker.
  • The creation of separate academies for boys and girls on the same campus led to a dichotomous understanding of gender, in which girls were seen as “good” and boys were seen as “bad.”
  • The elimination of classroom distractions from members of the opposite sex was academically beneficial to some students. But students still experienced harassment and teasing in coeducational spaces of single-gender academies. Girls received unwanted comments and were touched while they were in coeducational spaces. Students not in the academies teased those who were enrolled, calling them “bad” kids, “preppy” or most commonly “gay.”

Richard D. Kahlenberg of the Century Foundation said, “Policies that are going to purposely segregate students by race or gender or income or religion are antithetical to what American public education is supposed to be about, which is to bring children of different backgrounds together.”

I am left with the impression that proponents of single sex education shift the blame from the school system to students. In order to improve students’ education, the administration needs to change, not the student body. Teachers should be trained to teach gender/sex equity and to be aware of power imbalances among different populations in their classrooms. In situations where behavior is a distraction, the teachers should receive better training to deal with individual behavioral issues. Simple modifications such as allowing the student to sit on a ball instead of in a chair at his desk help children with sensory processing disorders and ADHD. Single sex education is not a solution to gender inequity in the educational system. Such an institution neglects the 1.7% of babies born intersex, neither male nor female. Proponents of single sex education claim that students will be less inhibited in single sex environments, denying the social/emotional needs of LGB students. I think it should be a state interest to have students that are well-adjusted to collaborating with people from different social groups and identities — and sex segregated schools don’t contribute to that.

A segrated school in Birmingham. April 4, 1961.

A segregated school in Birmingham. April 4, 1961.

Redefinition

•November 12, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Keith Olbermann made some special comments after Prop 8 passed in California.

He pointed to the many times in history when America has had to redefine marriage in order to uphold civil rights. He said, “I keep hearing this term ‘redefining marriage.’ If this country hadn’t redefined marriage, black people still couldn’t marry white people. Sixteen states had laws on the books which made that illegal in 1967… 1967. The parents of the president-elect of the United States could not have married in nearly one third of the states in the country their son grew up to lead.”

UPDATE: Wanda Sykes came out at one of the Proposition 8 protests in Los Angeles. She told a crowd at a protest in Las Vegas on Saturday, “You know, I don’t really talk about my sexual orientation. I didn’t feel like I had to. I was just living my life, not necessarily in the closet, but I was living my life.”

wanda-sykes300

She said, “Everybody that knows me personally they know I’m gay. But that’s the way people should be able to live their lives.

Sykes said the passage of California’s Proposition 8 made her feel like she was “attacked.”

“Now, I gotta get in their face. I’m proud to be a woman. I’m proud to be a black woman, and I’m proud to be gay,” she said.

Import Aisle

•October 28, 2008 • Leave a Comment

The name of my favorite aisle at a local Meijer store has been gradually evolving over the past decade since the store first opened in 1994. The first sign hanging from the rafters identified it as the “ethnic foods” aisle. Then it became “world foods”. Most recently it was changed to “international foods”. I was impressed when the store’s management or PR department decided on “international foods” because the former “ethnic” qualifier implied that the other foods in the store were not ethnic, or marked. By labeling the foods as “ethnic” the populations associated with the foods were othered. It was as if the products had to be shelved there because the ethnicities associated with them were not integrated into American society. Imagined ethnic differences kept foods in this aisle from being shelved according to categories like “condiments”, “noodles”, or “canned vegetables”. The soba noodles could only dream of some day joining their friends (radiatore, elbows, and spaetzle) in the pasta section. “World foods” was questionable too because it failed to recognize that foods in other aisles were just as much a part of global dietary patterns as anything in my favorite aisle. “International foods” has been the most appropriate label because it identifies the foods based on country of export and not on an exoticized ethnicity.